![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editorial introduction | The article itself | References | The works of R K Narayan | Copyright of images | Background information
Blanca Hernández, Professor of English in San Sebastián, Spain, lived in India for ten years and wrote a thesis about the women in R K Narayan's novels. She visited him at his home and corresponded with him for eight years. In this article she describes her experiences when trying to meet, and eventually meeting, the great man. Blanca
Hernández:
I began to read his works just as I found them, and discovered that those writings contained the true India: crowded, mystic, beautiful and poor; with its long history, complicated and even cruel; its deep philosophy, its art... Although India had remained far away, as I read Narayan's writings I was feeling it nearer and nearer, so I decided to return there. That was in April 1984. All the details regarding that journey made it a crazy adventure, but ten years in India give me a right to regard it as my second home, so I was off; Narayan was on my schedule. In London and Barcelona I had already been told that Narayan had a difficult character as well as an aversion to interviews. Although I am not easy to convince, the “Sahitya Akademi” (The Hindi Academy of Letters) in New Delhi gave me the coup de grâce. I was warmly welcomed, but everybody there agreed to what I already knew about Narayan. All day they tried to get him on the phone... in vain! in the end, they persuaded me to give up and not waste the short time I had going to the south, as the situation was quite uncertain. So I set my course northeast, to the tribal area in the mountains, the second point in my schedule.
In the early eighties, plane tracks turned and twisted a lot with intermediate stops, and during one of those stops my periodical disappeared. In my desperate search for the invaluable magazine, I turned the 747 jumbo upside down. I prayed to Lord Ganesh. The sympathetic crew radioed the last airport just in case a cleaner had removed my magazine and it could be found. But no such luck. It was as if Narayan had the magical power to influence events against those who wanted to inquire into the writer's intimate adventure between his feelings and the words. He had written: “Having a living author on hand may be like having a live lobster on your plate.” (NARAYAN, R.K., 1969, page 66) The problems are of a different nature, but several complications may arise and last. During one year Narayan had been the objective of my research, I had read all he had written, and all others had written about him; I myself had written about his intelligence, his sense of humor, sometimes sharp, his vehemence, his unconventional behaviour; I was especially impressed with the way in which women were treated in his works. All this made him a very interesting writer and meeting him an attractive challenge that had to be taken up, so I returned some years later - in 1991.
Narayan was present in all my movements by land or by air, and I tried to verify whether my master thesis about the Indian woman, as I had understood it in Narayan's works, and even in my experience during the years I had lived in India, was valid. Therefore I was very interested in the situation of the women I met, the way in which they projected themselves and their behaviour. I asked Anu if she was from Mysore and whether she knew the way to Narayan's house. She said “Yes” to both questions and added that she would take me there that evening, although by the time we arrived, it would be night already. We found the house, so I had taken a step towards my objective; we arranged to meet in the morning. Mr Chandru, Narayan's son-in-law, welcomed us warmly. The house was green and beige and by day, in the October sun, it gleamed gaily. It was the sort of detached house where an upper middle class family in India is expected to live. Next to it there was a small garden, well looked after. I noticed a twisted trunk, rather spectacular and unusual, and asked the elderly guard how it had got there. He did not know, but he knew that Narayan used it for concentration practice. Some weeks later, I asked Narayan himself and he said that he had seen it in a village, and as he had liked it, the villagers had given it to him. It seemed that concentration practice had nothing to do with it. I doubted that I would pay a second visit to that house, so I asked permission to take some photographs of the inside - better something than nothing. In fact I returned three times and spent several hours inside that house I had labelled as unattainable, but that belongs to my second jouney to Mysore. The interior was tidy and simple, with a complete lack of ostentation.
I made the most of the day I spent in Mysore to get to know Malgudi, Narayan's fictional town. There I found the river Sarayu, where The Bachelor of Arts had seen Susila for the first time; the Mempi Hills, with the “Sadhu” and the tiger sharing their contemplative life, in A Tiger for Malgudi; the railway station, where Krishna, The English Teacher, was anxiously waiting for his wife who was certain to arrive with a lot of luggage and their baby as well. All these places can be found in most of Narayan's stories, along with the College, The Lane, Lawly Road and Kabir Street. Among the palaces and temples which make a jewel of this town, I remembered the Dashara Festival with the elephants almost robed in gold and silver, and the sacred dancers, so well described in The Man-eater of Malgudi, where the dancer with her own body and her dance, reaching the point of exhaustion, protected the elephant from being killed. Another important aspect is nature's generosity to Mysore giving it giant trees and enormous rhododendrons covered with red flowers. I also tasted the extraordinary coffee from Mysore, always present in Narayan's stories and, of course, I took to it. Even Anu was the living image of Susila in The Bachelor of Arts: as young as her, she was married to a bank manager, but she was still studying at Bangalore university for her M.A., so her little son of two was living with her parents, and she spent her weekends with him. No doubt, her life was already longer than that of Susila.
My trek back home via Mysore started with stops in Guwahati, Delhi, Madras, and Bangalore. On 2 October I was again inside one of those ancient rickety coaches to Mysore. The moment I arrived at the hotel, I phoned as promised to agree the time for the following day..., or so I thought! “We shall meet this evening, at 6.00, but phone again before coming. You will have only one hour.” I was at a loss of what to do, it was 3.00 p.m. and I still had an unresolved problem: since passing through London airport, I had been trying to buy a good, small and discreet tape-recorder, but strangly, I had not found any. I rushed to town and found only a radio-cassette that was not good, neither small nor discreet, but recording Narayan's voice was top priority. I had not slept for over forty hours, I felt I had been playing hide and seek with the clouds, the trees and the stars; I was not really walking, was floating over an unreal space, I was so tired that I could not distiguish between reality and imagination. It seemed that mythical moment I had dreamt about for years, had arrived, at last I was going to meet my favourite writer personally!
When I arrived, Narayan, his daughter Hema and Mr Chandru were waiting for me outside the house. We entered their sitting-room and, despite my nervousness, a very pleasant conversation began. Everything aroused Narayan's curiosity: the ethnics of Meghalaya, Spain, Franco, bullfights... Quite embarrassed, I had got my radio-cassette out of my bag and had asked permission to record what I had thought would be an interview. I do not know what amused him the most, the size of my recorder or my embarrassement, but he was very amused. Narayan had given me only one hour, but three hours had passed when I decided to take my leave in order not to abuse my kind hosts. Then, in keeping with Indian hospitality, I was offerred something to drink, Mysore coffee of course. Another big surprise awaited me: Narayan himself, with his reputation for not being very sociable, offerred me the opportunity to interview him the following day. I could not believe my luck! Again he limited the time, three quarters of an hour, but his generosity was greater than his toughness.
We also talked about studies, religion, books, Graham Greene, his literary preferences... He liked poetry, but only up to that by T. S. Eliot, because he could not understand modern poetry. He was so humble that he did not say anything about good or bad poetry, just what he could understand. He liked history and good fiction and said that Graham Greene was his favourite writer.
On a rainy day, Graham Greene opened the drawer, read it and got enthusiastic about it. The world gained an interesting writer, and Greene got a second home. Later, after having named Tolstoy, Henry James, Turgenev, Chekhov and Conrad, Graham Greene wrote: “Narayan (whom I don't hesitate to name in such a context) more than any of them wakes in me a spring of gratitude, for he has offered me a second home. Without him I could never have known what it is like to be Indian... ... No one could find a second home in Kipling's India or Forster's India.” (GREENE, G., 1981, page 26)
In The English Teacher, the death of Susila, Krishna's wife, is told very vividly: Krishna, the main character, is broken with pain and only with the help of a medium can he find some relief, as through him Krishna can feel Susila is near. Narayan has said that this is the most autobiographical of his writings (I do not forget My Days) and it is very easy to identify Susila as Rajam.
“... When I opened my eyes again she was sitting on my bed looking at me with an extraordinary smile in her eyes... ... I'm here, have always been here... ... The first purple of the dawn came through our window, and faintly touched the walls of our room. 'Dawn!' she whispered and rose to her feet... ... We stood at the window... ... A cool breeze lapped our faces. The boundaries of our personalities suddenly dissolved. It was a moment... ... for which one feels grateful to life and death.” (NARAYAN, R.K., 1978, page 184) I had intended to ask about that passage in my interview, although I was aware of the problem: if it was not fiction, it belonged to Narayan's most private sphere, and his generosity and goodness towards me deserved all my delicacy, but... how could I let the opportunity slip by? I dared ask him the question, but I felt so insecure and was so scared that I made a terrible mess of “gurus” and mediums. In the end everything was clarified, and I managed to ask him whether the end of that novel was true, and if in his case, the medium had worked. With a sober and serene attitude that impressed me, he answered just that it had because, if the medium is good, it always works. My second 'interview' with Narayan was over, it had lasted one hour and a half. He was expecting a visitor, who arrived while I was still there. He left me for a while and returned with his last two books, which he signed for me.
Before I said goodbye to Narayan, I asked him if I could write to him; his answer was typical Narayan: “Yes, yes, you can write to me, I won't reply.”
1935: Swami and Friends, 1978, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 1937: The Bachelor of Arts, 1979, Mysore, Indian Thought Pub. 1938:The Dark Room, 1976, New Delhi, An Orient Paperback. 1941: My Days, 1974, Mysore, Indian Thought Publication. 1945: The English Teacher, 1978, London, Heinemann. 1949: Mr Sampath-The Printer of Malgudi, 1993, London, Minerva. 1952: The Financial Expert, 1981, Chicago, U. Chicago P./Hein. 1955: Waiting for the Mahatma, 1979, London, Heinemann. 1956: Next Sunday, 1956, Delhi, An Orient Paperback. undated: Lawley Road, New Delhi, An Orient Paperback. 1958: The Guide, 1982, Mysore, Indian Thought Publication. 1962: The Man-Eater of Malgudi, 1979, Delhi, Hind Pocket Books. 1965: Gods, Demons and Others, 1979, Delhi, Hind Pocket Books. 1967: The Vendor of Sweets, 1983, Harmondsworth, King Penguin. 1969: My Dateless Diary, 1969, New Delhi, An Orient Paperback. 1970: A Horse and Two Goats, 1970, Delhi, Hind Pocket Books. 1976: The Painter of Signs, 1982, Harmondsworth, King Penguin. 1977: The Emerald Rout, 1978, Mysore, Indian Thought Publicat. 1983: A Tiger for Malgudi, 1984, Harmondsworth, King Penguin. 1985: Under the Banyan Tree (Sous le Banian), 1994, Paris, Belfond 1986: Talkative Man, 1987, New York, Viking. 1990: The World of Nagaraj, 1990, New York, Viking. 1993: The Grandmother's tale(Le Conte de Grand-Mère), 1994, Paris, Belfond. NARAYAN, R. K.: “Green Saree”, London Magazine, February-March, 1975 NARAYAN, R. K.: "Among Multitudinous Voices", Times Literary Supplement, 6 July 1984 © 2001 Blanca Hernández
R K Narayan was born on 10 Oct 1906 and died on 13 May 2001. (Birth: Some say 1907. Presumably he had, like most older Indians, and the Queen of England, two birthdays, the astrological [or physiological] birthday and a passport birthday [official or documentary birthday].) He married Rajam in 1934. Their daughter Hema was born in 1936. Rajam died of typhoid in 1939. Hema died in 1994. "His friend Kittu Purna, who showed some of his short stories, and his first novel, Swami And Friends, to Graham Greene in Oxford in the early 1930s. The book had already made the rounds of London publishers, and Narayan had advised his friend to "weight the manuscript with a stone and drown it in the Thames." ... "When Greene surfaced from the war in the mid-1940s, the literary friendship resumed. It became a tradition for Narayan to send all his major fiction to Greene for an opinion before publication. For years, Greene edited the writing, cleaned up the grammar, supplied titles, and energetically sang his prodigee's praises in the literary world." (Guardian, London, 14 May 2001) For a while Narayan ran his own publishing company, Indian Thought Publications.
About the author
Blanca Hernández |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |